Tagalog
Contributed by Rowena Garcia and Rhenee Espayos (ResearchGate profile )
The English version of the questionnaire was used for elicitation.
How to cite
Garcia, Rowena & Rhenee Espayos. 2020. Bivalent patterns in Tagalog.
In: Say, Sergey (ed.). BivalTyp:
Typological database of bivalent verbs and their encoding frames.
(Data first published on August 11, 2023; last revised on December 13, 2023.)
(Available online at https://www.bivaltyp.info , Accessed on )
Basic info
Coordinates: 14.06, 121.75 .
Genealogy (as given in WALS ). Family: Austronesian, genus: Greater Central Phillipine.
Macro-area: East and Southeast Asia.
Data
Subset examples by valency pattern
Any
NA
ACT_BARE
ACT_CAUSE
ACT_gamit
ACT_LIN
ACT_LOC
ACT_mulaPATH
ACT_PATH
ACT_SBJNV
LOC_ACT
SBJNV_BARE
SBJNV_CAUSE
SBJNV_LIN
SBJNV_LOC
TR
UND_ACT
UND_LIN
Subset examples by locus
Any
*
TR
X
XY
Y
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
Masakit
ang
ulo
ni
Pedro.
painful
subj
head
pers
.
gen
pn
‘Pedro’s head hurts.’
Note: Not included in the database because Y is expressed as an NP-internal modifier. Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
May
trangkaso
si
Pedro
exist
flu
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro has the flu.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-ta~takot
si
Pedro
sa
aso
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~be_afraid
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
dog
‘Pedro is afraid of the dog.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<in>agis
ni
Pedro
ang
bato
<
pv
>
pfv
.throw
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
stone
‘Pedro threw a stone.’
Note: Co-exists with an AV construction.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
May
sapat
na
pera
na
si
Pedro
exist
enough
lin
money
already
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro now has enough money.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
Ka-hawig
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
lolo
com
-resemblance
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
grandfather
‘Pedro resembles his grandfather.’
Note: Not included in the database because X is expressed as an NP-internal modifier.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-ni~niwala
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
.
ipfv
-
ipfv
~believe
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro believes Miguel.’
Note: Co-exists with the causativized construction with LV and Y argument marked as PERS.SUBJ.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
K<um>uha
si
Pedro
ng
libro
<
av
>
pfv
.take
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
book
‘Pedro took a book.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-ki~kita
ni
Pedro
ang
bahay
pot
.
pv
-
ipfv
~see
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
house
‘Pedro sees a house.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Naka-ka~impluwensya
sa
memorya
ang
edad
pot
.
av
-
ipfv
~influence
dat
memory
subj
age
‘Age influences memory.’
Note: This kind of marking co-exists with the [SUBJ; GEN] encoding, hence the verb is classified as ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-ka-salubong
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
pot
-
com
-encounter[
pv
]
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro encountered Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
P<um>asok
si
Pedro
sa
bahay
<
av
>
pfv
.enter
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
house
‘Pedro entered the house.’
Note: The Y argument can also be signaled as "pa-loob ng bahay" [<AV>enter[PFV] DIR-inside GEN house].
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
T<in>alo
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.beat
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro beat Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
L<um>abas
si
Pedro
ng
bahay
<
av
>
pfv
.went
out
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
house
‘Pedro went out of the house.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
D<in>a~dala
ni
Pedro
ang
baka
sa
pastulan
<
pv
>
ipfv
~bring
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cow
dat
pasture
‘Pedro is bringing the cow to the pasture.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
B<in>aluktot
ni
Pedro
ang
sanga
<
pv
>
pfv
.bend
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
branch
‘Pedro bent the branch.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
S<in>abih-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pfv
>say-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro told Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LIN
X: SBJNV
Y: LIN
Locus: XY
May
hawak
na
libro
si
Pedro
exist
hold
lin
book
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is holding a book’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<um>abol
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
pfv
.catch
up
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro caught up with Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
G<in>atas-an
ni
Pedro
ang
baka
<
pv
>
pfv
.milk-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cow
‘Pedro milked the cow’
Note: Ask Sergey. The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
Naka-rating
si
Pedro
sa
bangko
pot
.
av
.
pfv
-reach
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
bank
‘Pedro reached the bank.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y argument can also be signaled by a locative phrase.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<in>awak-an
ni
Pedro
ang
pader
<
pfv
>touch-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
wall
‘Pedro touched the wall.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<In>a~away
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
ipfv
~fight
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
pn
‘Pedro is fighting Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
Kaibigan
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
friend
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is friends with Miguel.’
Note: Not included in the database because X is expressed as an NP-internal modifier. Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
<In>i~isip
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
ipfv
~think
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is thinking about Miguel.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
K<um>ain
si
Pedro
ng
mansanas
<
av
>
pfv
.eat
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
apple
‘Pedro ate an apple.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Pr<in>ito
ni
Pedro
ang
isda
<
pv
>
pfv
.fry
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
fish
‘Pedro fried the fish.’
Note: Co-exists with the AV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Nag-hi~hintay
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
-
ipfv
~wait
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro is waiting for Miguel.’
Note: Co-exists with a PV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-ka-limut-an
ni
Pedro
ang
iba
pa-ng
daan
pot
.
pfv
-
stem
-forget-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
other
clitic-
lin
way
‘Pedro forgot about the other road.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Naka-depende
ang
memorya
sa
edad
stat
.
av
.
pfv
-depend
subj
memory
dat
age
‘Memory depends on age.’
Note: Ask Sergey. Non-verbal predicate (state).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
T<in>awag
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.call
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro called Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-kilala
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
pot
.
pv
-
pfv
.know
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro got to know Miguel.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
ACT_SBJNV
X: ACT
Y: SBJNV
Locus: Y
Kilala
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
knows
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro knows Miguel.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (pseudo-verb). The interpretation of X as ACT is partially arbitrary (it is based on similarity on the analogy with constructions with voice markers).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
T<um>u~tugtog
ng
gitara
si
Pedro
<
av
>
ipfv
~play
gen
guitar
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is playing the guitar.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
<Um>i~iwas
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
ipfv
~avoid
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro avoids Miguel.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible. Co-exists with the LV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
G<um>awa
ng
panghuli
ng
daga
si
Pedro
<
av
>
pfv
.make
gen
trap
gen
rat
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro made a mousetrap.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
P<in>ag-ta~tawan-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~laugh-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is making fun of Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
May
kotse
si
Pedro
exist
car
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro has a car.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<in>a~hanap
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
susi
<
pv
>
ipfv
~find
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
keys
‘Pedro is looking for his keys.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
P<in>inturah-an
ni
Pedro
ang
bakod
<
pfv
>paint-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
fence
‘Pedro painted the fence’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
K<in>agat
ng
aso
si
Pedro
<
pv
>
pfv
~bite
gen
dog
pers
.
subj
pn
‘A dog bit Pedro.’
Valency pattern:
LOC_ACT
X: LOC
Y: ACT
Locus: X
Na-wala-n
ng
bahay
si
Pedro
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-lose-
lv
gen
house
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro lost his house.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<in>u~huli
ni
Pedro
ang
pusa
<
pv
>
ipfv
~catch
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cat
‘Pedro is trying to catch the cat.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-bali
ni
Pedro
ang
patpat
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-break
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
stick
‘Pedro broke a stick.’
Note: Alternative is a POT.AV construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
B<in>o~bola
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
<
pv
>
ipfv
~flatter
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is flattering Maria.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
M<in>a~mahal
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
<
pv
>
ipfv
~love
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro loves Maria.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
W<in>a~wagayway
ni
Pedro
ang
panyo
<
pv
>
ipfv
~wave
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
handkerchief
‘Pedro is waving the handkerchief.’
Note: Alternative is the AV construction, also with the ACT_UND pattern.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-nga~ngarap
si
Pedro
ng
bago-ng
sasakyan
av
-
ipfv
~dream
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
new-
lin
vehicle
‘Pedro is dreaming of a new car.’
Note: Alternative is the CAUS<PV> construction, also with the ACT_UND pattern.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<in>ugas-an
ni
Pedro
ang
baso
<
pfv
>wash-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cup
‘Pedro washed the cup.’
Note: The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
I-s<in>uot
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
pantalon
cv
<
pv
>
pfv
.put
on
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
trousers
‘Pedro put on his trousers.’
Note: Alternative is the AV construction, also with the ACT_UND pattern.
Valency pattern:
UND_LIN
X: UND
Y: LIN
Locus: XY
T<in>a~tawag
na
compass
ang
gamit
na
ito
<
pv
>
ipfv
~call
lin
compass
subj
tool
lin
prx
.
subj
‘This tool is called a compass.’
Note: This is a transimpersonal construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
P<in>arusah-an
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
anak
<
pfv
>punish-
pv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
son
‘Pedro punished his son.’
Note: The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<In>atake
ng
oso
ang
mangingisda
<
pv
>
pfv
.attack
gen
bear
subj
fisherman
‘A bear attacked a fisherman.’
Valency pattern:
UND_ACT
X: UND
Y: ACT
Locus: X
Na-puno
ng
tubig
ang
timba
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-fill
gen
water
subj
bucket
‘The bucket filled with water.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-hanap
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
susi
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-find
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
keys
‘Pedro found his keys.’
Valency pattern:
UND_ACT
X: UND
Y: ACT
Locus: X
K<in>ulang
ng
piso
si
Pedro
<
pv
>
pfv
.fall_short
gen
one_peso
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro is one peso short.’
Note: The valency label is partially arbitrary, since this verb does not fit the usual scheme: the encoding of arguments is not affected by the contrast between voice markers on the verb.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-ga~galit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
stat
.
pv
-
ipfv
~angry
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro hates Miguel.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_SBJNV
X: ACT
Y: SBJNV
Locus: Y
Gusto
ni
Pedro
ito-ng
damit
like
pers
.
gen
pn
3.
sg
.
subj
-
lin
shirt
‘Pedro likes this shirt.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. The interpretation of X as ACT is partially arbitrary (it is based on similarity on the analogy with constructions with voice markers).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-nga~ngailang-an
si
Pedro
ng
pera
ipfv
.
av
-
ipf
~need-
av
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
money
‘Pedro needs money.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-pali~libut-an
ng
pader
ang
lungsod
ipfv
.
mod
-
man
-
ipfv
~surround-
lv
gen
wall
subj
city
‘Walls surround the city.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_BARE
X: SBJNV
Y: BARE
Locus: XY
May
sampung-piso
na
lang
si
Pedro
exist
ten-pesos
now
only
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro only has 10 pesos left.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
S<in>agot
ni
Pedro
ang
guro
<
pfv
.answer>[
lv
]
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
teacher
‘Pedro answered the teacher’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Nag-bukas
si
Pedro
ng
lata
av
.
pfv
-open
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
can
‘Pedro opened a can.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-i~iba
ang
damit
ko
sa
iyo
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~be_different[
av
]
subj
shirt
1.
sg
.
gen
dat
yours
‘My shirt is different from yours.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-huli
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
pfv
>
stem
-be_last[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro fell behind Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<In>a~araro
ni
Pedro
ang
bukid
<
pv
>
ipfv
~plough
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
field
‘Pedro is ploughing the field.’
Note: Co-exists with the AV-construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_BARE
X: ACT
Y: BARE
Locus: Y
Na-nga~ngamoy
gasolina
ang
kamay
ko
pot
.
pv
.
ipfv
~smell
gasoline
subj
hands
1.
sg
.
gen
‘My hands smell of gasoline.’
Note: The label BARE is used because there is no overt flagging associated with this argument.
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
T<um>awid
si
Pedro
sa
kalsada
<
av
>
pfv
.cross
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
road
‘Pedro crossed the road.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y-argument can be introduced by PATH-expression.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
K<um>anta
si
Pedro
ng
maganda-ng
kanta
<
av
>
pfv
.sing
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
beautiful-
lin
song
‘Pedro sang a beautiful song.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
S<um>ulat
si
Pedro
ng
liham
<
av
>
pfv
.write
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
letter
‘Pedro wrote a letter.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<Um>inom
si
Pedro
ng
gatas
<
av
>
pfv
.drink
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
milk
‘Pedro drank the milk.’
Note: Co-exists with the PV-construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
T<in>unaw
ni
Pedro
ang
piraso
ng
tingga
<
pv
>
pfv
.melt
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
piece
gen
lead
‘Pedro melted a piece of lead.’
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
Bagay
ang
sinturon
sa
damit
ko
appropriate
subj
belt
dat
dress
1.
sg
.
gen
‘This belt goes well with my dress.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective).
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
Ni-lisan
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
pinanggalingan
pfv
-leave[
p
ath
v
]
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
native_city
‘Pedro left his native city.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-ta~takp-an
ng
karpet
ang
buo-ng
sahig
pot
.
pv
-
ipfv
~cover-
lv
gen
carpet
subj
whole-
lin
floor
‘The carpet covers the whole floor.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-a~alala
pa
ni
Pedro
ang
bahay
na
kinalakihan
niya
pot
.
pv
-
ipfv
~remembers
still
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
house
lin
place_where_one_grew_up
3.
sg
.
gen
‘Pedro still remembers the house where he grew up.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
T<in>u~lung-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
~help-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro helped Miguel.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Naka-ka~intindi
si
Pedro
ng
French
pot
.
av
-
ipfv
~understand
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
f
rench
‘Pedro understands French.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
T<in>ama-an
ng
kidlat
ang
bahay
<
pfv
>hit-
lv
gen
lightning
subj
house
‘Lightning hit the house.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_gamit
X: ACT
Y: gamit
Locus: Y
Na-hiwa
ni
Pedro
ang
sarili
gamit
ang
pang-ahit
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-cut
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
self
using
subj
razor
‘Pedro cut himself with a razor.’
Note: gamit is a originally a verb that has partially grammaticalized into a preposition.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-dikit
ang
baso
sa
mesa
pfv
>
stem
-stick[
av
]
subj
glass
dat
table
‘The glass got stuck to the table.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-talo
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
pfv
>
stem
-lose[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro lost to Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-galak
si
Pedro
sa
sulat
<
pfv
>
stem
-be_glad[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
letter
‘Pedro was glad about the letter.’
Note: The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-ki~ki-pag-usap
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
av
-
soc
~
ipfv
-
nom
-communicate
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro is speaking with Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-nganak
ng
anak
na
lalaki
si
Maria
av
.
pfv
-give_birth
gen
child
lin
male
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Maria gave birth to a son’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-hulog
ni
Pedro
ang
salamin
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-drop
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
glass
‘Pedro dropped the glass.’
Note: Ask Sergey. Co-exists with the regular PV construction that implies intentional action and has the same encoding frame.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
P<in>a-mu~munu-an
ni
Pedro
ang
amin-g
bayan
caus
<
pv
>
ipfv
~run-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
1.
pl
.
ex
.
dat
-
lin
town
‘Pedro runs our town.’
Note: The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-ngu~ngulila
si
Pedro
kay
Maria
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~feel_lonely[
av
]
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro misses Maria.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_PATH
X: ACT
Y: PATH
Locus: Y
S<um>u~sunod
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
ipfv
~follow
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro follows Miguel.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
ACT_mulaPATH
X: ACT
Y: mulaPATH
Locus: Y
B<um>aba
si
Pedro
mula
sa
kabayo
<
av
>
pfv
.go
down
pers
.
subj
pn
from
dat
horse
‘Pedro got down from the horse.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-ki~kinig
si
Pedro
sa
radyo
<
av
>
ipfv
~listen
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
radio
‘Pedro is listening to radio’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with the same Y-argument, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
S<um>u~sunod
palagi
si
Pedro
sa
nanay
niya
<
av
>
ipfv
~obey
adv
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
mother
3.
sg
.
gen
‘Pedro always listens to / obeys his mother.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible, hence ACT_UND. Co-exists with the PV-construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-ri~rinig
ni
Pedro
ang
tugtugin
pot
.
pv
.
ipfv
~hear
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
music
‘Pedro hears the music.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
H<um>alo
ang
pulot
sa
gatas
<
av
>
pfv
.mix
subj
honey
dat
milk
‘The honey got accidentally mixed with the milk.’
Note: Ask Sergey. I classified this as ACT_LOC because I observe "sa". But maybe it alternates with ng?
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
T<in>i~tign-an
ni
Pedro
ang
ulap
<
ipfv
>
ipfv
~look-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
cloud
‘Pedro is looking at the clouds.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<in>ubad
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
damit
<
pv
>
pfv
.take_off
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
shirt
‘Pedro took off his shirt.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-pa~panaginip-an
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
pot
.
pv
.
ipfv
~dream-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro dreams about Maria.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The GEN encoding of Y is possible in the AV construction, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
S<um>ang-ayon
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
<
av
>
pfv
.agree
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro agreed with Miguel.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<In>away
si
Pedro
ni
Maria
<
pv
>
pfv
.fight
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
gen
pn
‘Maria quarreled with Pedro.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LIN
X: ACT
Y: LIN
Locus: Y
Nag-ka~ka-halaga
ng
piso
ito-ng
baso
av
-
com
~
ipfv
-cost
lin
one_peso
3.
sg
.
subj
-
lin
cup
‘This cup costs 1 peso.’
Note: The DAT encoding of the Y-argument is also possible.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
B<in>aril
ni
Pedro
ang
ibon
<
pv
>
pfv
.shoot
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
bird
‘Pedro shot the bird.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Nag-salin
si
Pedro
ng
asukal
sa
garapon
av
.
pfv
-pour
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
sugar
dat
container
‘Pedro poured the sugar in a container.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-wala
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
susi
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-lose
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
key
‘Pedro lost his keys.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
L<um>ubog
ang
troso
sa
tubig
<
av
>
ipfv
.sink
subj
log
dat
water
‘The log sank in the water.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
P<in>atay
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.kill
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro killed Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
S<in>untok
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.hit
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro hit Miguel’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
H<in>alik-an
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
<
pv
>
pfv
.kiss-
lv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro kissed Maria.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Naka-basa
si
Pedro
ng
isa-ng
nakakatuwa-ng
libro
pot
.
av
.
pfv
-read
pers
.
subj
pn
gen
one-
lin
interesting-
lin
book
‘Pedro read an interesting book’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
G<in>alaw
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
daliri
<
pv
>
pfv
.move
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
finger
‘Pedro moved his finger.’
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
<Ni>re~respeto
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
<
pv
>
ipfv
~respect
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro respects Maria.’
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Nan-di~diri
si
Pedro
sa
maru~rumi-ng
hugasin
ipfv
.
stem
-
ipfv
~to_feel_disgusted
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
dirty.
pl
-
lin
dishes
‘Pedro is squeamish about dirty dishes.’
Note: Ask Sergey
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_CAUSE
X: SBJNV
Y: CAUSE
Locus: XY
Kuntento
si
Pedro
dahil
sa
kaniya-ng
anak
content
pers
.
subj
pn
because.of
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
son
‘Pedro is content with his son.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective).
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
Na-pa-ibig
si
Pedro
kay
Maria
pot
.
pv
.
pfv
-
caus
-fall_in_love
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro fell in love with Maria.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The GEN encoding of the Y is also possible with different NPs, hence ACT_UND.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Nag-ti~tiwala
si
Pedro
kay
Maria
av
-
ipfv
~trust
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro trusts Maria.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
ACT_LOC
X: ACT
Y: LOC
Locus: Y
Na-ki-ki~simpatya
si
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
nanay
av
-
soc
-
ipfv
~sympathize
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
mother
‘Pedro sympathises with his mother.’
Note: The GEN encoding of the Y is not possible.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-i~inggit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
stat
.
pv
-
ipfv
~envy
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro envies Miguel.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-ga~galit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
stat
.
pv
-
ipfv
~angry
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro is angry with Miguel.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-gulat
si
Pedro
sa
regalo
sa
kaniya
stat
.
pv
.
pfv
-shock
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
gift
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
‘Pedro was surprised at this gift.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
Mahilig
sa
tsaa
si
Pedro
like.
adj
dat
tea
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro loves tea’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective). The Y-argument can only be signalled by DAT.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
Mahilig
si
Pedro
sa
mainit
na
tsaa
like.
adj
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
hot
lin
tea
‘Pedro enjoys hot tea’
Note: Non-verbal predicate (adjective). The Y-argument can only be signalled by DAT.
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
Gusto
ni
Pedro
ng
bago-ng
telepono
like
pers
.
gen
pn
gen
new-
lin
phone
‘Pedro wants a new mobile phone.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. The GEN marker on the Y-argument signals indefiniteness (otherwise SUBJ is required). Co-exists with the construction in 129. The pattern is exceptional and cannot be fitted into the classification based on voice contrasts.
Valency pattern:
SBJNV_LOC
X: SBJNV
Y: LOC
Locus: XY
May
sama
ng
loob
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel
exist
bad
gen
feelings
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro has a grudge against Miguel’
Note: Non-verbal predicate.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-galit
si
Pedro
kay
Miguel.
stat
.
pv
.
pfv
-angry
pers
.
subj
pn
pers
.
dat
pn
‘Pedro took offence at Miguel. (Pedro got angry at Miguel.)’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
TR
X: ACT
Y: UND
Locus: TR
I<ni>nis
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
pv
>
pfv
.upset
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro greatly upset Miguel’
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-mangha
si
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
bayan
stat
.
pv
.
pfv
~be
amazed
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
town
‘Pedro marvelled at this town’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
K<in>asu-suklam-an
ni
Pedro
si
Miguel
<
ipfv
>
stem
-
ipfv
~despise-
cv
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro despises Miguel.’
Valency pattern:
NA
X: *
Y: *
Locus: *
S<um>ama
ang
loob
ni
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
anak
<
av
>
ipfv
.get_bad
subj
feelings
pers
.
gen
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
son
‘Pedro got upset with his son.’ (Lit. ‘Pedro’s feelings at his son got bad.’)
Note: Not included in the database because X is expressed as an NP-internal modifier.
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
Na-i~irita
si
Pedro
sa
kaniya-ng
anak
na
babae
stat
.
pv
-
ipfv
~irritate
pers
.
subj
pn
dat
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
child
lin
female
‘Pedro is getting irritated with his daughter.’
Note: Ask Sergey. The Y-argument i) can be introduced by an explicit causal marker and ii) can be promotoed to subject in the causal voice construction.
Valency pattern:
ACT_SBJNV
X: ACT
Y: SBJNV
Locus: Y
Gusto
ni
Pedro
si
Maria
like
pers
.
gen
pn
pers
.
subj
pn
‘Pedro likes Maria.’
Note: Non-verbal predicate. The interpretation of X as ACT is partially arbitrary (it is based on similarity on the analogy with constructions with voice markers).
Valency pattern:
ACT_CAUSE
X: ACT
Y: CAUSE
Locus: Y
I-k<in>a-hi~hiya
ni
Pedro
ang
kaniya-ng
tangkad
cv
-ka<
pv
>
ipfv
~shy
pers
.
gen
pn
subj
3.
sg
.
dat
-
lin
height
‘Pedro is shy about his height.’
Note: Ask Sergey